An Adoptee Investing in Champions

Troy Matthews, or Dr. Matthews as he is better known today, was Dean of Students at my Bible College and was also Associate Pastor at my church in 1989/90. Troy was adopted at birth and always spoke openly, positively and generously about his experience. Although I was only 17/18 years old when I was one of his students and not really thinking about my future family too much at the time, his example influenced me significantly when the time came that my wife and I were considering adopting.

There are some heart-breaking stories of cases where adoption hasn’t been approached sensitively or lovingly (towards both the child and the birth parents). Unfortunately, some of those stories get a little more air time than the great majority of ones where children and families flourish through their experience with adoption. Troy is a fantastic example of a man who not only flourished, but is now helping others flourish also.

Together for Adoption recently published Troy’s story:

Troy was born to a young mother in Snyder, Texas, and because of the closed adoption he doesn’t know much more than that about his fraternal parents. Simultaneously to this woman’s pregnancy, a young couple had battled several miscarriages and were urged by a local pastor in Snyder to consider adoption – particularly the adoption of Troy. They quickly realized that this was their “gift from God.”

Today, Troy puts it in his own words, “They were his gift from God.” …

Dr. Matthews is now a professor of “Contemporary Issues”, a course required by all majors at Liberty. The subject matter directly approaches one’s world view – affirming a Biblical world view and also applying it. Topics such as adoption, abortion, and a Christian’s moral responsibility to such topics and understanding of absolute truth’s found in Scripture. These courses are designed to affirm a believers responsibility to the world around them.

Troy is “a champion, … reinvesting in others to be young champions as well. – just as (he) was invested in.”

If you’re in Australia and considering investing in adoption, National Adoption Awareness Week can provide you with the starting point. Click on the link for your state to find out more. If you have already been involved with Adoption there are many opportunities for networking and support with other families and adoptees.

In the USA check out the links on the Together for Adoption site.

Karen’s Adoption Links has information for other countries.

 

Do orphans need saving?

This question is complex and volatile. There is a tendency to be over simplistic when talking about adoption using terms and phrases like “saving” the orphans. However it is important to distinguish between advocating adoption as a vital means to helping and serving children in need of a permanent family and “saving” them. Lets be clear about this, there’s only ONE saviourand it’s not me nor is it any other adoptive parent, advocate or ambassador.

Kawale Orphan Care in Lilongwe, Malawi

Kristen Howerton has a lengthy blog post about this and she deals with the issue with substance and sensitivity.

I don’t like the savior narratives applied to adoptive parents.  I don’t like people telling me I’m amazing just because I’ve adopted.  Because I’m not.  I am a very human mom who is sometimes shrill and selfish and impatient and just plain mean.  I did not “save” my adopted kids.

I am very careful to never give my adopted children the feeling that there is some extra gratitude required from them.  They are a part of my family just like my daughters.  They have every right to be ungrateful, or resent me, or wish that they had never been adopted.  I don’t talk to them about where they came from as if they needed to be saved.  So on the one hand, I do take care to avoid the savior meme.

Citing a detailed example from Haiti arising from the recent turmoil caused the earthquakes she urges readers, it’s time to sit up and take notice:

This is a long post.  I hope you will read the whole thing, and I hope you will read it without judgment of the people involved.  People who serve in Haiti face the awful task, every day, of how many people they can help.  Orphanages are overcrowded simply because some very good people have a hard time turning away one more helpless child.  If this outrages you, then think about what part YOU can play.  There can be no outrage at people who serve in Haiti, as we sit at our computer screens in our comfortable homes in America.  But you need to know that this is real.

… Please, read the full post

 

An adoption connection with the tribes of Israel

In reading the Old Testament, when a geographic region is mentioned, it is usually referred to in terms of its tribal allocation. Depending on your attention to detail, you might get a bit confused when you try to line up these tribal allocations with the original sons or family heads of Jacob (later renamed, Israel). For the majority of us, the most familiar son of Jacob is probably Joseph (i.e. the owner of the multi-coloured coat). Yet, there is no ‘tribe of Joseph‘ so to speak. Instead, Joseph’s two son’s, Manasseh and Ephraim, form two new family tribes and receive a land allocation along with ten of Jacob’s other sons. K. A. Matthews in The New American Commentary on Genesis offers the explanation that Jacob adopted Manasseh and Ephraim and gave them the same legal recognition and inheritance of his other (direct biological) sons.

Jacob claims the sons of Joseph as his own, making them full recipients of his inheritance on the same order as Jacob’s other sons (Gen 48:5–6). … Ephraim and Manasseh will have full status as Jacob’s sons (not merely grandsons), receiving their rightful legacy. The [text] reinforces the new standing that Ephraim and Manasseh receive. This adoption extends to Joseph’s first two sons only, not those Joseph may produce subsequently; future offspring will not have their brothers’ elevated status, meaning that their inheritance will fall under the territorial designations of Ephraim and Manasseh (Gen 48:6; Josh 14:4). …

… the sons of Joseph also receive firstborn rights as the adopted sons of Israel (1 Chr 5:1–2). … The adoption of Ephraim and Manasseh as the “sons of Jacob/Israel” also had implications for the configuration of the “twelve tribes of Israel.” … the Blessing of Moses counts twelve tribes by deleting Simeon and dividing the house of Joseph into Ephraim and Manasseh (Deut 33:17). In the idealized count presented by Ezekiel (Ezk 47:13–14), the land divides into twelve equal allotments with two going to Joseph, since the tribe of Levi receives no portion (Ezk 44:28). ~ (Mathews, K. A. 2007. Genesis 11:27-50:26 (electronic ed.). Logos Library System; The New American Commentary. Vol. 1B (874–876). Broadman & Holman Publishers: Nashville)

 

Elmo Learns About Adoption

Deborra-lee Furness, the patron of National Adoption Awareness Week in Australia, talks to Elmo from Sesame Street about adoption.

National Adoption Awareness Week (NAAW) is a series of community based events exploring the process of adoption, and the journeys of all people touched by adoption, locally and internationally.

NAAW was launched in Australia in 2008. Due to its success, it will be held annually in November and will coincide with adoption awareness around the world. NAAW 2010 will be held from 8th to 14th November.

NAAW aims to acknowledge and learn from all adoption-related journeys and experiences. It creates opportunities for open, honest and ongoing dialogue between all parties to adoption, to increase awareness of its complexities, challenges and opportunities.

A more informed and constructive attitude to adoption will flow through to policy-making, support services and education, and will help Australia work towards a more positive adoption environment.

 

International Adoption – Facts

Image via Wikipedia

Following on from my recent posts about Adoption Myths, below are some facts provided by Dr Jane Aronson a.k.a. “the orphan doctor,” founder and CEO of Worldwide Orphans Foundation (WWO). Jane is also an Ambassador for National Adoption Awareness Week here in Australia.

1. MORE CHILDREN THAN EVER NEED HOMES
2. BUT MOST KIDS ARE NO LONGER LIVING IN NIGHTMARES
3. CHILDREN ADOPTED FROM OVERSEAS USUALLY DO JUST FINE
4. THE PROCESS GETS VERY PERSONAL
5. ADOPTING IS JUST ONE WAY TO HELP

The full article here.

 

Adoption Myth #10 – Birth Mothers get on with their life after giving up a child

National Adoption Awareness Week aims to demystify the issues around adoption, raise awareness and acknowledge all parties in adoption. Part of that aim is to dispel the “Myths of Adoption.”

Adoptive parents in Australia identified the top ten myths they have to deal with when talking with family, friends and passers-by in the shopping centre that can’t resist asking “Whose child is that?”

MYTH # 10 – Birth/Natural mothers get on with their lives after giving a child up.
FACTS – The grief of giving up a child never leaves a person.

It is easy to be so focused on the child and the adopting parents that another, critical, party is left unconsidered. In most cases, especially with international adoptions, no information is available on the birth parents. Much is presumed about their attitude and condition that simply isn’t fair and more often than not, is unsubstantiated.  Xinran Xue, when visiting Sydney on a book tour a few years back, vividly pointed this out, when she noted, in the audience at one reception, a high number of adoptive parents with Chinese children. Her tearful comment was, “Thank you for loving our daughters”.

To assume that Chinese women, or any others (!) are flippant and uncaring about their decision to relinquish their children evidences an insular, uninformed bias. This bias contributes to the anti-adoption attitude in our government and community today. A bias that National Adoption Awareness Week hopes to, in part, begin to, reverse.

“Wanting a Daughter Needing a Son“, by Kay Ann Johnson provides a good start point, in regard to Chinese Adoption, for those wanting to know more.