<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Bloke's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apologies.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>An Aussie Christian Bloke chats briefly about all sorts of stuff...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church has nothing to say apart from the Scriptures by Samuel Skinner</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/church-nothing-apart-from-scriptures/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=115#comment-144</guid>
		<description>He is a brilliant scientist, but...
Why isn't it ever and?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a brilliant scientist, but&#8230;<br />
Why isn&#8217;t it ever and?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No excuses for atheism by Samuel Skinner</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/no-excuses-for-atheism/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-143</guid>
		<description>No- the quote obviously refers to the Vedas! Or the Book of the Dead or possibly the Analects... I think.

On a more on topic note, why the heck did you have the quote in the first place? It sounds- no, it IS a complete rehashing of the quote you give, but denser and less comprehensible. It is like what people used to do to be in the party- repeat what they say, only slightly differently.

Seriously- if all theologians can do is repeat the bible, why do you even bother quoting them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No- the quote obviously refers to the Vedas! Or the Book of the Dead or possibly the Analects&#8230; I think.</p>
<p>On a more on topic note, why the heck did you have the quote in the first place? It sounds- no, it IS a complete rehashing of the quote you give, but denser and less comprehensible. It is like what people used to do to be in the party- repeat what they say, only slightly differently.</p>
<p>Seriously- if all theologians can do is repeat the bible, why do you even bother quoting them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No excuses for atheism by vitaminbook</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/no-excuses-for-atheism/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>vitaminbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Good God, Van Til is right.

I'm going to become a Muslim immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good God, Van Til is right.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to become a Muslim immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No excuses for atheism by Morse</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/no-excuses-for-atheism/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Morse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=119#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Um...who is looking for an excuse? We see no evidence for your god, or any other one. If your god is arbitrary enough to punish people for honestly not believing in him, but for otherwise being good people, then he's not worth worrying about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;who is looking for an excuse? We see no evidence for your god, or any other one. If your god is arbitrary enough to punish people for honestly not believing in him, but for otherwise being good people, then he&#8217;s not worth worrying about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Laminin Factor by albyg</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/the-laminin-factor/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>albyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Cheers.
Many non-Christian scientists also refer to the structure as the "Laminin X".
Regardless, the functionality of the protein points to Christ - as does all creation - it's just that this little piece of creation has a louder voice :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers.<br />
Many non-Christian scientists also refer to the structure as the &#8220;Laminin X&#8221;.<br />
Regardless, the functionality of the protein points to Christ - as does all creation - it&#8217;s just that this little piece of creation has a louder voice <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Laminin Factor by Wyatt Roberts</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/the-laminin-factor/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. Actually the cross shape of laminin shown in diagrams is not for the sake of convenience, but is the actual shape (more or less) of the molecule itself. In &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e4zgJXPpI4" rel="nofollow"&gt;his presentation (~6:40) &lt;/a&gt;, Giglio shows an slide taken from an electron microscope of the actual molecule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. Actually the cross shape of laminin shown in diagrams is not for the sake of convenience, but is the actual shape (more or less) of the molecule itself. In <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e4zgJXPpI4" rel="nofollow">his presentation (~6:40) </a>, Giglio shows an slide taken from an electron microscope of the actual molecule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church has nothing to say apart from the Scriptures by albyg</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/church-nothing-apart-from-scriptures/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>albyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=115#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Al Mohler has also &lt;a href="http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=1150" rel="nofollow"&gt;summarised this new report about Einstein&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Mohler has also <a href="http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=1150" rel="nofollow">summarised this new report about Einstein</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church has nothing to say apart from the Scriptures by albyg</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/church-nothing-apart-from-scriptures/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>albyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=115#comment-135</guid>
		<description>I have read before about Einstein's beliefs. I think he was a deist or at best an agnostic.
Brilliant though he was in the fields of Physics etc, his alledged opinion of God or scripture doesn't alter their authority, authenticity or application to our redemption.
The word of God abides forever, men of science come and go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read before about Einstein&#8217;s beliefs. I think he was a deist or at best an agnostic.<br />
Brilliant though he was in the fields of Physics etc, his alledged opinion of God or scripture doesn&#8217;t alter their authority, authenticity or application to our redemption.<br />
The word of God abides forever, men of science come and go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church has nothing to say apart from the Scriptures by sulochanosho</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/church-nothing-apart-from-scriptures/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>sulochanosho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=115#comment-134</guid>
		<description>All these days I heard the following words of Einstein: 
&lt;b&gt;“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”&lt;/b&gt;

But the other day it is reported in the Guardian that a lost letter written by Einstein has been traced and it's going to be auctioned next week in London.

I am surprised to read a different tone of passage written by Einstein in that letter. The lines here: &lt;b&gt;“The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.”&lt;/b&gt;

Please do read the report at: &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;

I read it on a blog too: &lt;a&gt;http://markii.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lost-letter-einstein-on-religion/&lt;/a&gt;

Please give us the right counseling. May the Lord bless all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these days I heard the following words of Einstein:<br />
<b>“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”</b></p>
<p>But the other day it is reported in the Guardian that a lost letter written by Einstein has been traced and it&#8217;s going to be auctioned next week in London.</p>
<p>I am surprised to read a different tone of passage written by Einstein in that letter. The lines here: <b>“The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.”</b></p>
<p>Please do read the report at: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion" rel="nofollow">The Guardian</a></p>
<p>I read it on a blog too: <a>http://markii.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/lost-letter-einstein-on-religion/</a></p>
<p>Please give us the right counseling. May the Lord bless all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recovering Fundamentalist by albyg</title>
		<link>http://apologies.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/recovering-fundamentalist/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>albyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apologies.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Amen.
Thanks for your encouragement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.<br />
Thanks for your encouragement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
